Thursday, October 20, 2016

ZANU PF lies and propaganda exposed



One lie consistently told by ZANU is that the split was because “Nkomo was opposed to armed struggle.” The facts tell us something entirely different.
As early as 1959, Nkomo as leader of the SRANC asked the Ghanaian government of Kwame Nkrumah for assistance with military training. The first six who went were Mark Nziramasanga, Sikhwili Kohli Moyo, Edward Mzwayi Bhebhe, Mudavanhu, and two other comrades. When J.Z. Moyo went to Ghana for their passing out ceremony, he met a young Zimbabwean named Robert Mugabe, a lecturer at Ghana’s Tokaradi Teachers College who he recruited. It seemed a good idea at the time.
In 1960, under the auspices of the NDP, another group went for military training, this time in China. The group included David Mapongo, Philemon Makonese and Charles Chikerema.
By the middle of 1962, sabotage operations by ZAPU on white-owned farms and against government installations had reached such proportions that the Southern Rhodesia Ministry of Information organised an aerial tour of the country to show journalists and chiefs the massive damage done to the white-owned farms.
It was also in 1962 that Nkomo received the first batch of arms from President Nasser of Egypt; these arms were then smuggled into the country. Later that year, the car carrying many of these weapons was stopped by Rhodesian police and the driver, Bobylock Manyonga was arrested and badly tortured but refused to disclose the origin of the arms. He was then given 15 years imprisonment.
It was in 1963 that the first batch of military trainees, including Dumiso Dabengwa and Ackim Ndlovu went to the Soviet Union for military training. This was the turning point. Anti-communists within ZAPU opposed this and sought for reasons to create a split.
Now ZANU came on to the political scene.
Of the leaders of the ZANU split, Ndabaningi Sithole had been trained in the USA, Herbert Chitepo was trained in Britain and a member of the Capricorn Africa Society and the Father of Tribalism in Zimbabwe, Leopold Takawira, was a long time employee and executive officer of the Association founded by David Stirling.
It was David Stirling who formed the SAS, the British special services unit during the Second World War. After the war he organised mercenary detachments in a number of different countries including Saudi Arabia, founding WatchGuard International in the 1960s. During the 1970s Stirling formed an organisation funded by millionaire James Goldsmith to undermine the British trade union movement and another, GB75, to stage a military coup in Britain should there be civil unrest.
Many in the British establishment after the Second World War had understood the dangers of settler racism in southern Africa and were anxious to create an African assimilado class which would work in the imperialist interest. The Capricorn Africa Society was formed in 1949 and had an important conference in Salima, Nyasaland. There it was proposed that all citizens regardless of colour should be able to vote, but that better qualified people should get up to six votes depending on qualifications and property ownership. By the early 1960s to be a “Capricon” meant to be a “Sell-out”.
It was the Capricon, Takawira who, spoke disparagingly about this “huge Ndebele man”. There was no lack of militancy by ZAPU. There was no need of a split from the African side. There was the need of a split from the imperialist side.
Ethnic or religious division has been used as a tool by British imperialism throughout its history


FROM TAURAI NJABULO CHIRANDU NJEKETE's post on fabebook!
Cpoied and pasted
LikeShow more reactions
Comment

Activist Mabhena speaks out on first encounter with Prof Moyo!




The following are my personal comments regarding the Prof Jonathan Moyo saga. My comments should never be attributed to any of the organizations l belong to;
The Prof Jonathan Moyo saga: Is it a coincidence?
In mid 2005, l had an opportunity to be invited to a dinner in Rivonia, Johannesburg with Prof Jonathan Moyo. It was shortly after he had won the elections in his rural constituency as an independent candidate after his firing from ZANU(PF) following the now famous Tsholotsho declaration. We are told that, the main objective of the Tsholotsho meeting sometime in 2004, was to plot the elevation of the now Vice President Hon Emmerson Mnangagwa to the position of Vice President. At the time, the political contest was between Mnangagwa and Dr Joyce Mujuru, now leader of Zimbabwe People First.
The dinner happened at the time when Prof Moyo was advocating for what he called ,"the 3Rd way". This was a political project , whose main aim was to find an alternative between ZANU(PF) and the MDC. At the time, his views (which he still holds) was that, the MDC was a project of imperialist forces and that ZANU(PF) had betrayed (he has changed ) the ideals of the liberation struggle, and therefore, according to him and his friends, it was critical to establish a third way movement.
So when my comrade, Dr Churchill Guduza (now Deputy President of Mthwakazi Liberation Front) invited me to the dinner,I was a bit uneasy , but l could not have refused a chance of engaging Prof Moyo on his political views.
During dinner, l asked Prof Moyo why he supported Hon Mnangagwa given his alleged involvement in the Gukurahundi genocide in the 80s. The Prof was very frank, he said, "you know Cde Dube (by then l was a Dube) ,Mnangagwa is the only person who can make resources available for developmental projects in Matabeleland and Midlands". The reason advanced by Prof Moyo in that dinner, was that , Hon Mnangagwa felt he needed to be accepted by the people of Matabeleland and Midlands following his involvement over Gukurahundi. I latter had a breakfast meeting with Prof Moyo towards the end of 2005 and that was the end of our contact. In all our engagements, he came across as a person who had passion for development in Matabeleland and of course very ambitious.
When news broke out last week, that Prof Moyo is a target of some law enforcement agencies, my mind ran back to the engagements we had over dinner and breakfast in 2005.
Firstly, the Mlevu family (Prof Moyo's father family) is reported to have taken a decision to rebury Prof Moyo's father. It's said that, his father was killed by the Gukurahundi in 1982 and was not given a decent burial by his family. The reburial of Prof Moyo's father will afford the families of those who lost their loved ones to seek permission to rebury their relatives, that is, if they know where they are buried. This would open a new debate around the Gukurahundi genocide. A person like Mnangagwa (who is fingered and has political ambitions) would be the last man to want this to happen.
It is common cause that, Prof Moyo belongs to G40 and Mnangagwa belongs to Team Lacoster. The decision by the Mlevu family is seen as the Prof Moyo decision to spite Team Lacoster. As expected, Team Lacoster can not just fold arms, they ought to act fast. The only way they can stop G40 from embarrassing them (through the reburial of Moyo's father) is to throw Prof Moyo in prison.
I have had some of my comrades saying, some of us are jumping to defend Prof Moyo because he is a Ndebele. Far from it. Prof Moyo is a victim of the Gukurahudist who will do everything in their power to stop us from knowing what really happened during Gukurahundi. We want to know what happened to our relatives who went missing in the hands of 5th brigade. We want to rebury our relatives who are buried in shallow graves.
While it is wrong for anyone to use state resources to advance the political interests of ZANU(PF) , it can not be equally correct to use state apparatus to silence those who want to give their relatives , victims of Gukurahundi, a decent rebury.
In my political activism, l have never believed in an animal called, "coincidence". It can not be coincidence that, in the same week that the Mlevu family want to rebury their loved one,their son is to be thrown in some dirty police cell.

Ngqabutho Nicholas Mabhena!

This was a direct extract form his facebook page